JJ Bell is a racing driver who last raced in NASA. Bell has recorded 0 wins and 0 podiums from 1 start.[1]
A Racer Rating of 949 ranks Bell 32015th of 40,700 indexed drivers, on an Elo scale where the strongest reach the high 8,000s. It is built from every indexed race in the driver's file, decayed for time since their last race.
| 2017-08-05 | Utah Motorsports Campus Super Touring 3 | P11 | −51 |
| Season | Series | Team | Races | Wins | Podiums | DNFs | Poles | Points | Pos | Gain/Loss | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | ▸NASA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P36 | −401 | 949 |
| # | Driver | Series | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32,008 | 🏳️ Chris Huston | NASA | 949 |
| 32,009 | 🏳️ Craig Berry | NASA | 949 |
| 32,010 | 🏳️ D. Hiffman | PCA Club Racing | 949 |
| 32,011 | 🏳️ Doug Hilton | SVRA | 949 |
| 32,012 | 🏳️ E S. Kimmitt | PCA Club Racing | 949 |
| 32,013 | 🇺🇸 Garry Gray | SVRA | 949 |
| 32,014 | 🏳️ Geoff Crockett | NASA | 949 |
| 32,016 | 🏳️ James Kagey | NASA | 949 |
| 32,017 | 🏳️ Jim Keesling | NASA | 949 |
| 32,018 | 🏳️ Jimmy C. Badia | SCCA Regionals | 949 |
| 32,015 | 🏳️ JJ Bell | NASA | 949 |
| 32,019 | 🏳️ Johnny Kanavas | NASA | 949 |
| 32,020 | 🏳️ Kent Hebert | NASA | 949 |
| 32,021 | 🏳️ Kevin Nichols | NASA | 949 |
| 32,022 | 🏳️ L Keen | PCA Club Racing | 949 |
| 32,023 | 🏳️ Matt Harness | NASA | 949 |
| 32,024 | 🏳️ Matthew Million | NASA | 949 |
| 32,025 | 🏳️ Mike Fitzwater | NASA | 949 |
| 32,026 | 🏳️ Mike Kasser | NASA | 949 |
| 32,027 | 🏳️ Nai Ko | NASA | 949 |
| 32,028 | 🏳️ S. Phelps | PCA Club Racing | 949 |
JJ Bell raced in NASA, a multiclass American road-racing championship that ran graded professionals alongside amateurs and semi-professionals in the same events. Bell drove a production-based car in the Super Touring 3 class and competed at a developing level, the foundation stage of racing where drivers are building experience and learning racecraft.[1]
Bell's indexed record consists of a single start in 2017, finishing 36th in the season standings. The limited sample offers little basis to characterise consistency or progress through a campaign.[2]